Following a conversation on Twitter, triggered by @twickerman, we wrote to ask Richmond Council why there’s a roadworks sign here. As Twickerman observed, it’s dangerous for cyclists, and it’s not even a particularly important notification, either.
So we asked the council to explain it. Here’s their letter:
Thank you for your enquiry regarding the works currently ongoing in Twickenham Town Centre and in particular the Men at Work “End” sign.I will ask my Engineer to inspect the works to ensure it is correct and appropriately placed.
Unfortunately, removal of this sign is not possible as road works have to be signed and guarded to an acceptable level (Traffic Signs manual Chapter 8), failure to comply could lead to prosecution.I trust this answers your enquiry but please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information regarding these works.
… Senior Engineer, Highways and TransportEnvironment Directorate
(You can read the Traffic Signs Manual here. If you do, don’t forget to read this bit:
“O3.14.6 Where there is cycle provision, such as cycle lanes or tracks, efforts should be made to keep these open or to provide an acceptable alternative during the road works. They should not be blocked by signs, debris, plant etc.”)
To be honest, we didn’t think this particularly satisfactory. Given how much traffic can be pushed through this area at peak times, it seems woefully inappropriate to place signs like this. So we’ve written back to them, asking for some more details about what they normally do to ensure signs and appropriately placed (or at least more appropriately than this!).
Since then, we’ve been told of a second sign, on the opposite side:
We’ll keep on at the council to find out what’s going on here: it seems madness that one can claim fear of prosecution for putting signs in places that make cycling more dangerous and unpleasant than it already is!