How to find a way not to do something

Twenty’s Plenty for Barnes

20mphRoundel100x100The council is planning a 20 mph consultation in Barnes.  It is worth opening the consultation (here) to have a good laugh at the outrageous hurdles the council puts in place in an attempt to get away with doing nothing. Here’s a flowchart one of our members made a while ago – it looks like they’re following it to the letter. No 20mph for Richmond

 

Traffic speeds are already sufficiently low to allow 20 mph to be put in place eh?  What a cop out?  Surely 20 mph should be put in areas where speeds are too high!   51% of people that live on the street have to agree.  Our elected officials know how hard it is to get 51% of the vote – none of them can manage it even when there’s a general election on the same ballot paper.

It feels like these hurdles have been set so that they can get away with doing nothing.  Let’s prove them wrong by responding, even if you don’t live in the targeted area it is important to show support from across the borough, if this scheme goes through it will be contagious and we’ll be on the road to a 20 mph borough where walking and cycling journeys are safer and more pleasant.

Zac's survey 'Why don't you cycle?"

In Zac’s cycling survey many people said they wanted to cycle more but won’t because it does not feel safe.  20 mph makes areas feel safer and it makes them actually safer, at 30 mph 1 in 5 will die in a collision.  At 20 mph 1 in 40 will die.

We think that the area targeted should be made 20 mph even if 51% of the vote is not achieved.  More than a quarter of roads in London are already 20 mph with that number increasing all the time.  In Richmond it’s less than 5%. Does Richmond council care about making our roads feel safer?  Write and ask them.

tfl-outlines-new-sites-for-potential-20mph-speed-limits

Nearby Hammersmith and Fulham recently had 71% support via consultation for a borough wide 20 mph scheme.  Richmond upon Thames is really starting to look like it is stuck in the 1970’s a 30 mph island in a 20 mph sea.  The Mayor gets it, he wants 10 000 fewer road casualties by the end of the decade and that will be achieved in part with TfL’s 20 mph zones.  It doesn’t seem like RUT want to contribute to that reduction, because they make it so difficult to get 20 mph streets.

Our response is below- please write to the council and tell them to make this happen!

  • The area targeted should be made 20 mph even if 51% of the vote is not achieved.  >25% of roads in London are already 20 mph with that number increasing all the time.
  • The area should be expanded to include Lonsdale Road.  There are several schools on this road, it is a popular cycle commuting route to Hammersmith station and car speeds are typically closer to 40 mph than the stated 30 mph.  Make it 20 and make people stick to it.
  • Washington Road – RCC welcome the consideration to protect cyclists from right turning vehicles, this is a step towards a creative scheme to reduce rat running traffic, but why not make it cover the entire consultation area.  Investigate how vehicle movements planning can be combined with filtered permeability to make the entire area more liveable and encourage short journeys on bicycle.  Design the streets so that they can be accessed by all but not used as a rat run. There is an existing filtered permeability treatment at Boileau and Lonsdale which could be used as a model for the rest of the consultation area.
  • Many Richmond parents drive their children to school as they think it’s too dangerous for them to walk or cycle, this is a great chance to link the schools of Barnes and use this as a model for the rest of the borough

Filtered permSo please head along to the consultation page here, and tell the council that 20’s plenty. You can also email them directly at highwaysandtransport@richmond.gov.uk

 

One thought on “How to find a way not to do something

  1. In Hammersmith and Fulham, 55% of people rejected the council’s proposal for borough-wide 20mph, despite the council’s propaganda campaign. So creative accounting had to be used to claim ‘massive’ or even ‘majority’ support. Look at www lbhf gov uk for the large amount of hostile comments from residents. Tailored measures to local problems yes, but giving all the roads a funereally low limit definitely no! HFcyclists had to admit that a number of their own members didn’t back the plan.

Comments are closed.