About Tim Lennon

Local Dad, who owns a bicycle. I believe cycling is something everyone should be able to do without fear, intimidation or danger, whether they're 8 or 80. I'm the Campaigns Co-ordinator for Richmond Cycling Campaign and a Board Member for the Cycling Embassy of Great Britain.

The Cycling Liaison Group – YOU HAVE BEEN CONSULTED!

(What’s the Cycling Liaison Group? It’s a consultative council committee, with sadly no power and no burning urge to meet too often, or actually publicise itself. See the council’s summary, here. )

Tuesday night was the last Cycling Liaison Group in its current form. Our Cycling Champion is moving to Oxford, and there are local elections in May. Since one in three CLG meetings has been cancelled, there probably wouldn’t be one between now and May even if it had been scheduled.

Frankly, it’s been a shameful talking shop for its entire existence. The most consistent themes of the CLG have been hearing about theft of bikes, and the minimal ‘cost-effective’ schemes that have been whizzed up by harassed council officials.

But what did happen? On the positive side, it sounds like substantial funding is finally going to make it to cycling in Richmond. Not the £30m that successful Mini-Holland bids will get, but still there’s going to be millions of pounds over the next few years to try to make the borough a place where we can cycle safely to schools, the shops or to work.

An officer from the local Safer Transport Command discussed the Operation Safeway figures. This saw officers stalking a number of junctions in the area, and handing out an awful lot of tickets, both to drivers and cyclists. We’ve asked for a full copy of the figures, but inspection on the night suggested that proper enforcement had a significant impact on behaviour, with tickets issued falling significantly as the weeks went on. We’re delighted that enforcement activity does seem to be taken more seriously now, but since this operation is now over, we’ll be watching carefully to see how long this change lasts.

Everyone involved in the Mini Holland bid seemed genuinely surprised and disappointed by the borough’s failure to secure the funding. We think that parts of the bid were very strong, and we’d really like to see them implement the proposed changes in Twickenham. Officials think we’ll hear about the next round of funding in around four weeks’ time, so we’ll see what comes out then.

There’s also confirmation of £60,000 a year for cycle parking, and officials indicated they’re prepared to consider paying for residential parking for bikes as well. We’d love to see bike hangars popping up all over the borough, to make it easy and simple to store and access your bike, so please let us know if this is something you’d like!

Will things change after May? That’s up to you. We’re preparing to ask all the candidates to tell us what they’ll be offering to make the borough a great place for everyone by improving it for cycling, so watch this space!

 

 

Getting on a bike is just the best thing.

(Written as a quick response to Rachel Aldred’s excellent ‘the bicycle is human scale‘) 

This morning my daughter and I went to her class. She wanted to cycle, so we sent most of the journey on the pavements.

And it was great. We wobbled across the level crossing, said thank you to the man delivering papers who’d moved across for us, and smiled at the other Dad who was out cycling with his son.

The lady at the bus stop smiled at my daughter as she went by, and the drivers approaching the zebra crossing saw her standing there and waited patiently as she crossed all four lanes. And the Dad with a small baby strapped to him said ‘That’s brilliant’, as he let her make her way past.

While we were cycling along Manor Road, Zoe asked me what the beeping had been, and I could tell her she and I had crossed the level crossing just as it started beeping. When we got to the Carrington Road junction she told me, excitedly, “Daddy! My school is down there!”

Then, along North Road, we saw another local family and they shouted ‘Hello Zoe!’ as she cycled past and we waved.

Cycling with your children is just the best thing ever!

Zoe on North Road, using the area marked for parking …

Here’s our approximate route (Google Maps link). We left home at 9:30 and cycled over 4 miles.

Time for 20mph in Richmond

(Updated below – see the local 20′s plenty group, here.)

We think 20mph is plenty for our borough. Richmond has few roads where you ever really want to be doing 30mph, and the national (and international) evidence is mounting up.

You don’t think Three filmed this on a 30mph street, do you?

More and more, we’re hearing from other London boroughs, other areas of the UK, and from throughout Europe, about how slower speeds in residential and populous areas is a good thing for everyone involved.

But the council aren’t keen at all. Despite the Twickenham Action Plan including a 20mph limit, they’ve rejected a number of attempts to have specific roads go 20mph. Until recently, what you needed to do was this:

  1. Ask all the people in your road if they wanted a 20mph zone.
  2. Show the council that you had a majority – bearing in mind that anyone not answering is obviously a ‘no’.
  3. Have the council come round and consult again.
  4. And then get everyone to respond. And I mean everyone - because again, if they don’t reply, then the council will count that as a ‘no’.

So, you’d either need 51% of the voters to turn out, and every single person to vote for you, or if they all turned out, you’d need 51% of the voters.

Compare that to the council’s Heathrow referendum in 2013. On a 41% turnout, they had 72% against a third runway. If that had been a 20mph consultation, it would have failed. but here Lord True said “The people have spoken”. (Have a look at the lengthy discussion at the time on Twickerati, if you want to celebrate just how hard they made it.)

We think cycling needs somewhere safe, pleasant and calm, and if you read London Cycling Campaign’s ‘Space 4 Cycling’ pages, you’ll see how 20mph zones are a key component of this.

So take a moment and tell the council that you want 20mph using one of the consultations going on:

Want to know more about 20mph? Try the 20’s Plenty site, read a paper from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, find out why Bristol is going 20mph, and Camden, and Islington

Oh, and here’s what Transport for London says:

 And an update: pop along to Richmond’s local 20′s Plenty group, and sign their petition. 

March Newsletter

Did we say we were about to hear about the Mini-Holland bid? That’s due on 10th March, and it’ll be followed by the Cycling Liaison Group meeting, where you can come and hear what the council’s planning to do if we’re successful in the bid, but also what they’re going to do if we haven’t been successful.

Monthly Meeting

Our monthly meeting is at the usual venue – the Old Ship in Richmond – at 8pm on 17th March (Details here: http://is.gd/eahg52) Note we’re a week later than usual, because of the Cycling Liaison Group Meeting.

Consultation Watch

It’s a bit of a bumper month. but we’d really like you to reply to the two 20mph consultations on Whitton/Heathfield (here http://is.gd/2KHr3M) and Kew.(here http://is.gd/4upxtW)

Please take the opportunity to tell the council what a difference 20mph will make to our areas. You’ve got until 28 March on these two. (And you can see here – http://is.gd/LRsWzP – that the council already has its own data that 20mph is better!)

The ‘Kew Village Plan’ is also up for review. There’s a document link at the bottom of the consultation, on this page: http://is.gd/9c7i6v Their big idea is to remove the bus lane on Kew Road off-peak, in order to deal with congestion. We don’t think the bus lane causes congestion off-peak, so it would disadvantage those already brave enough to cycle down there. Please take the opportunity to tell the council they could really do more to encourage cycling in the area!

Also, Whitton Supplementary Planning Review – http://is.gd/U6NMku This fails to talk about making things more pleasant for either cycling or walking, so we’d urge you to point out just how much space there is here for cycling, and how any new developments need cycling provision included.

Finally – 20mph in Hampton Hill High Street http://is.gd/FZ2DVL. Please support this one as well, and the council might finally get the message. (Well, you could always say “Please make it easier to cycle!” around Hampton Square – http://is.gd/nMYdII )

Rides

One (maybe two!) rides this month:

On the 22nd March, a Ride for Everyone: Hampton Court and the Thames from Teddington Station leaving 10.20.

And, if someone can step in to help, we’d like to run an April 6th Ride for Explorers. Our ride leader’s in recuperation, so not able to lead this one – please get in touch rides@richmondlcc.co.uk – if you can help!

Maintenance Workshops

These are all in the calendar: http://is.gd/wRbxmB

Mortlake – 13th & 27th March, at the Old Bakery from 7pm. http://wp.me/pSDFw-4X

Twickenham – 26th March, at All Hallows Church from 7pm. http://wp.me/pSDFw-4U

Ham – 8th and 22nd March, Ham Youth Centre from 10am. http://wp.me/pSDFw-14t

Cycling Liaison Group

This has now been moved to 11th March, so that the CLG will be able to discuss the outcome of the borough’s Mini Holland bid. Details are here - http://is.gd/gqQg34 – although it’s a sad reflection of the commitment to cycling that the CLG has once again not met for nearly five months. Come and join us to find out how the council will spend new money from the mayor, and maybe have a cycling budget of its own!

Police Liaison Groups

Around the borough, the police hold regular ‘Liaison Groups’, where you can tell them what you’d like to prioritise. We’ve noticed that a few of these have focussed quite a bit on issues like cycling on the pavement or other minor cycling misdemeanours. Unless you’re a child, we don’t think you should be cycling on the pavement any more than the Police do, but we understand why some people choose to do so, especially when faced with hostile environments like the South Circular. The guidance from the Government is that Police should not issue blanket tickets for cycling on the pavement http://is.gd/VqSJsu, so we’ll be checking on this at the CLG …

If you’re thinking of going to your local Liaison Group to represent the interests of people who want to cycle, let us know, and we can share some tips!

Funding

Another funding round that came through a few weeks ago was a separate pot of cash that Transport for London distributed. Whilst some boroughs requested (and received) hundreds of thousands of pounds, Richmond asked for a grand total of £5,000 (see http://is.gd/Aobmvw). We think this is symptomatic of the borough’s failure to consider cycling, but it also gives the lie to our Cycling Champion’s claim that she’s been working hard to secure central Government funding for cycling in Richmond http://is.gd/824AOH.

Give Zac a Call

Richmond MP Zac Goldsmith is doing a survey to better understand how we feel about cycling, so please hop along to tell him what you think here – http://is.gd/eh9pkA. And you can tell Lib Dem candidate Robin Meltzer about cycling here – http://is.gd/5fHwpt.

And Finally …

Still, cycling featured in Top Gear this week, and the AA is printing a million stickers to remind drivers to give space to cyclists – http://is.gd/KhCWpS And Kevin, from ‘Can’t Stand up for Falling Down’ found a great video from 1984 showing London’s cycling ambition then: http://is.gd/n6auVz

Meanwhile, we’ll be on our bikes, enjoying the sunshine in Richmond Park this weekend, and waiting for the cull to finish, to do the magical circuit at night. You did know you could take your bike into the park at night, didn’t you? http://is.gd/eisZ1h

Richmond wants to fix getting safely to the park …

The council is looking to re-design the roundabout which leads on to the Richmond gate entrance to Richmond Park (streetmap view here), and RCC committee members are hoping to talk to council officials in the next couple of weeks about this, so we’d like your input!

Richmond Gate (from Google Streetview)

The roundabout has seen a number of incidents in the last few years (LBRuT have reported 10 collisions in the proximity of the gate with 8 of them involving cyclists – you can use  http://www.cyclestreets.net/collisions/ to see some of them), and they’re considering a number of options.

Our view is that this is a typically poor bit of infrastructure for cycling: there’s no way to access the park or leave the park on a bicycle without potential conflict with traffic that can be sometimes very heavy or very fast-moving,

If Richmond Park is to be a destination for everyone who wants to cycle, then it’s great news the council is looking to improve this crucial junction. Our hope is that changes made here can set a template for making our borough much friendlier for people seeking to access key facilities by foot and bicycle.  Options under investigation include moving the traffic island, and resurfacing, among others. What would you like to see happen here? Let us know via our email campaign@richmondlcc.co.uk or contact form.

The A316 – a correspondent writes …

A local member wrote to us recently, to ask about what’s happening with the A316. The short answer is nothing, although it now features heavily in the mini-Holland bid. Here’s what she said:

Wonder if you can help me? I am a cyclist using 316 to commute to and from work.Most of the times I use cycling lines but I find it very difficult to do that  just after Richmond roundabout when the cycling line moves to the right side of the road, when cycling towards central London. The stretch between the two roundabouts has 10 junctions with extremely poor visibility for cyclists and drivers. I had had 3 accidents there in the past year and have witnessed at least 10 accidents. Since I cycle on the pavement on the left knowing that I commit an offence. What I find very frustrating is the fact that that in the widest and most cycle friendly part of that pavement where hardly ever there are as many pedestrians as on the other side of the road,  the cycling is prohibited but in the narrower bit where there are shops and junctions the cyclist can share the pavement with pedestrians. Have you ever made any attempts to increase the cycling lane on both sides of 316 post Richmond roundabout? Can you also advise me who should I contact to express my views. Also do you know when we will know if the Mini-Holland bid was successful?

We’re aware of a number of issues with the A316, and we’ve endeavoured to highlight some of them on Cyclescape – see http://richmondlcc.cyclescape.org/tags/a316. Sadly, there’s nothing happening right now: it’s a feature which is very frustrating, because while it’s great to have a clearly built, off-road cycle lane along such a busy road, it’s rendered very annoying because of the choice to require cycling to give way to cars at every junction. As our correspondent writes, this makes it both feel unsafe, and be unsafe.

The stretch identified is especially problematic for cycling. We hear regularly of Police Liaison Groups fielding complaints about cycling on the north side of the A316 between Richmond Circus and Manor Circus. And yes, cycling along here is not allowed. Yet people continue to do so. And why? Because this is not an easy road to cross, with just two controlled crossings throughout this entire section, and traffic routinely passing through at more than the 30mph limit. In terms of relative risk and actual danger, a check of the road statistics for this section indicate pretty clearly from whom pedestrians are at risk along these roads, and it isn’t someone on a bicycle.

More and more people are using this facility, so it’s to be hoped that something’s going to happen soon – if we win the mini-Holland bid (http://www.richmond.gov.uk/mini_holland_bid), then the A316 is going to get a very substantial upgrade that could address almost all of these concerns.

Let’s get some parking here!

 

So the council are apparently actually interested in spending some money on cycle parking. It’s not much of a cycle strategy, but it is something that we think needs sorting out, so here’s a few suggestions we put together. We’ll update the list with the council’s response as we get it …

Where What Status
Kew Gardens More parking at each entrance. There’s none at Lion Gate, and insufficient at all the others Raised 20 October, 2013
Richmond Station More parking at the front of the station Raised 20 October, 2013
Kew Gardens Station More parking each side of the station Raised 20 October, 2013
Richmond town centre Throughout the town centre, basically
Whitton See here: Whitton parking Raised 14 October, 2013

We’d love to help the council with more details, and help them to keep track of actually spending this little pot of cash, so do let us know if you’d like to suggest then contact us using our form, or via campaign@richmondlcc.co.uk

Twickenham Town Centre – September 2013 Update

Spot the cycle lane - now you see it, now you don't

Lord True thinks Twickenham should “Go Dutch“. Parliament unanimously supported the Times’ Cities Fit for Cycling petition. And Richmond is in the next round of mini-Holland money that’s on offer to the outer boroughs.

So how come the plans for Twickenham are still so poor? Whilst it is good to be able to meet council officials and discuss the plans they have, these meetings seem to be becoming as useless as the Cycling Liaison Group – lots of opportunity to talk, but nothing of any substance ever really comes of it. In this case, we’re still looking at :
  • cycle lanes through town which disappear when the junctions get tricky
  • bicycles painted on the road as if that makes it safe and pleasant for cycling
  • facilities which cease to be available when you most need them – when it gets busy
So, from our point of view, it’s hard not to look at all the effort that Richmond Cycling members have put into Twickenham, and ask “Why did we bother?” Sadly, it’s not really much more useful for cycling than it was two years ago, despite I would hate to think how much time and money has been spent on these plans. And we’ve barely even started spending the millions of pounds that TfL are being asked for …

Delivering great cycling with fine words – Richmond leads the way. (And an Elephant)

If fine words delivered a seismic shift in the number of people cycling, Richmond Council would be almost as effective as Boris Johnson.

Once again, we sat through a meeting which was heavy on rhetoric, promises and fine ideas, and pretty thin on actual action that will make cycling an enticing thing to do in the borough. The thing is, the council is very, very good at talking about cycling, and we’re fairly sure they understand our concerns about how to make cycling a real option for everyone in the borough, but when it comes to actually doing something, their failure to follow through is frankly distressing.

But for the record, here’s what Richmond Cycling members observed from the meeting: (there is some good news at the end!)

  1. Local police have been running some ‘education’ on local Advanced Stop Lines. This has run for two weeks, and now they’re planning some actual enforcement activity.
  2. Bike thefts in Richmond are up, but they’re down in Kingston. To be honest, I’m sick of hearing about bike theft at the Cycling Liaison Group. Everywhere that people use bikes to get around, someone finds a way to steal some of them – it’s great that the police are looking into this, but I don’t see why it has to come to the CLG every single time.
  3. We heard from TfL that 19 of 20 eligible boroughs submitted bids for the Mini Holland money. The TfL rep was very impressed with Richmond’s bid, but also masterful at dodging any questions of substance. What we did find out was that up to 8 bids would be called forward to the second round, with seed cash to improve their bids, and then up to 4 boroughs will actually share the money.
  4. And we discussed the mini Holland bid – both Councillor Harrison, the cabinet member for transport, and Chris Smith, the head of planning, waxed lyrical about how convincing Andrew Gilligan was, and how committed he is. Which is great – we just feel it’s a pity that they’re not reflecting this enthusiasm in the designs that we see.
  5. The borough’s cycling strategy, which has been in gestation for longer than the Trident upgrade plan, is now apparently going to have to be re-visited again, because the current version apparently describes a strategy that doesn’t really reflect the mini Holland bid. We’re choosing to interpret it as a good thing that the council is trying to align these things, but we’ll wait until it comes out before we comment any more. 
  6. The one point we found very interesting: the council told us that they’re planning to get more on-street parking rolled out. Specifically they observed that you don’t need planning permission to do this, so if you’d like some parking for your bike, please get in touch (or email us: campaign@richmondlcc.co.uk), and we’ll start asking the council.

The Elephant

What’s that? Was there an elephant in the room? Well, yes. Sat on the table, in plain view but not on the agenda, was the Twickenham Plan. We managed to ask some questions about it, but basically we know that bits and pieces are going to consultation. This does represent a chance to at least seize the small improvements for cycling on offer, like the introduction of 20mph, and the Holly Road contraflow.

So if there’s one thing you do this month, please do reply to the consultation – we’ll provide some more details this week, and we’re also going to try to meet the council again, to see if we can get any improvements to the current appalling plans.