At the recent Transport User Group Meeting the Railway Police representative said that there had been a surge of bike thefts from Teddington Station. The Bike Hub seems to be the most secure option with effective CCTV acting as deterrent.
In this location it isn’t even desirable behaviour – a cyclist walking with a bike would fully block the route for some time. A sensible cyclist would ride up to the turn, stop ,wait for any walkers under the bridge, and when clear ride through quickly. There is already a pedestrian priority sign but maybe “Cyclists stop and look out for walkers” would be more explicit.
A pity that unimaginative planers see “Cyclists Dismount” as the solution to all problems – strange that you never see “Drivers push your vehicles”.
On the Good side Hounslow have finally joined the Heath Path to the Hanworth Road
Kew Road is mostly a lousy place to cycle. But until recently, it at least had mandatory cycle lanes along a large part of its length.
Given the volumes of traffic, and the potential for it to be an arterial route for people to cycle around the borough and from places like Kew Bridge, the road badly needs fixing. Recent changes have included over £100,000 spent on replacing a zebra crossing with a traffic-light controlled crossing, and resurfacing.
(Yes, you read that right: replacing this zebra crossing – apparently because a bus stop needed moving – cost over £100,000.)
(Image from Google Maps)
Most worrying about all these changes is that engineers told us there were concerns about speeding on Kew Road, and the new design of the crossing point above – which adds a pinch point – is expected to slow traffic. We don’t think it’s appropriate to plan to slow traffic by pushing cycling into the carriageway. Further, it’s hard to believe that resurfacing the road is actually going to do anything other than increase average speeds: so far, the it seems our borough engineers aren’t very on-board with TfL’s new interest in properly supporting cycling, or indeed with the new team.
We’ve asked the council to at least re-instate the cycle lanes properly, and will update you as soon as we have a response.
A local member wrote to us recently, to ask about what’s happening with the A316. The short answer is nothing, although it now features heavily in the mini-Holland bid. Here’s what she said:
Wonder if you can help me? I am a cyclist using 316 to commute to and from work.Most of the times I use cycling lines but I find it very difficult to do that just after Richmond roundabout when the cycling line moves to the right side of the road, when cycling towards central London. The stretch between the two roundabouts has 10 junctions with extremely poor visibility for cyclists and drivers. I had had 3 accidents there in the past year and have witnessed at least 10 accidents. Since I cycle on the pavement on the left knowing that I commit an offence. What I find very frustrating is the fact that that in the widest and most cycle friendly part of that pavement where hardly ever there are as many pedestrians as on the other side of the road, the cycling is prohibited but in the narrower bit where there are shops and junctions the cyclist can share the pavement with pedestrians. Have you ever made any attempts to increase the cycling lane on both sides of 316 post Richmond roundabout? Can you also advise me who should I contact to express my views. Also do you know when we will know if the Mini-Holland bid was successful?
We’re aware of a number of issues with the A316, and we’ve endeavoured to highlight some of them on Cyclescape – see http://richmondlcc.cyclescape.org/tags/a316. Sadly, there’s nothing happening right now: it’s a feature which is very frustrating, because while it’s great to have a clearly built, off-road cycle lane along such a busy road, it’s rendered very annoying because of the choice to require cycling to give way to cars at every junction. As our correspondent writes, this makes it both feel unsafe, and be unsafe.
The stretch identified is especially problematic for cycling. We hear regularly of Police Liaison Groups fielding complaints about cycling on the north side of the A316 between Richmond Circus and Manor Circus. And yes, cycling along here is not allowed. Yet people continue to do so. And why? Because this is not an easy road to cross, with just two controlled crossings throughout this entire section, and traffic routinely passing through at more than the 30mph limit. In terms of relative risk and actual danger, a check of the road statistics for this section indicate pretty clearly from whom pedestrians are at risk along these roads, and it isn’t someone on a bicycle.
More and more people are using this facility, so it’s to be hoped that something’s going to happen soon – if we win the mini-Holland bid (http://www.richmond.gov.uk/mini_holland_bid), then the A316 is going to get a very substantial upgrade that could address almost all of these concerns.
KCafe, Kings Field Youth Cafe Project, Church Grove, Hampton Wick, KT1 4ET
[osm_map lat=”51.412″ long=”-0.313″ zoom=”16″ width=”400″ height=”400″ marker=”51.4112,-0.3126″ marker_name=”bicycling.png”]
Ham Youth Centre, Ham Close, TW10 7PL (off Ashburnham Road)
[osm_map lat=”51.438173″ long=”-0.315256″ zoom=”16″ width=”400″ height=”400″ marker=”51.438173,-0.315256″ marker_name=”bicycling.png”]
The Old Bakery, Mortlake Training Centre, 69-71 Lower Richmond Rd, Mortlake SW14 7HJ
[osm_map lat=”51.4686″ long=”-0.2718″ zoom=”16″ width=”400″ height=”400″ marker=”51.4686,-0.2718″ marker_name=”bicycling.png”]
The Long Room, All Hallows Church, Twickenham, TW1 1EW
[osm_map lat=”51.4542″ long=”-0.3335″ zoom=”16″ width=”400″ height=”400″ marker=”51.4542,-0.3335″ marker_name=”bicycling.png”]
The Old Ship, 3 King Street, Richmond, TW9 1ND
[osm_map lat=”51.4599″ long=”-0.3065″ zoom=”17″ width=”400″ height=”400″ marker=”51.4599,-0.3065″ marker_name=”bicycling.png”]