Live from 5pm today (4th September)
Link to website HERE
A lot more exciting offers than on previous occasions and all have at least considered cycling (although one seems to have steps on what they call a cycle route.
Saturday 31st August
We meet a group from Kingston on the Ham Side of Teddington Lock at 9.50 and head across Richmond Park , crossing Wimbledon Park, Wandsworth Common, and Clapham Common aiming to get to Brockwell Park by 12. Bring a picnic.
12 miles each way quite hilly.
Six of us went and demonstrated that you can cycle across south London without too much traffic (apart from Earlsfield Station) . We also found that TfL is fond of making pedestrians and cyclists wait at toucan crossings.
I will be heading back about 2 – anyone is welcome to join me. Alternatively bring a physical or electronic map and make your own way. Clapham Junction is not far away for rail assistance back to our area.
At the recent Transport User Group Meeting the Railway Police representative said that there had been a surge of bike thefts from Teddington Station. The Bike Hub seems to be the most secure option with effective CCTV acting as deterrent.
Hounslow are consulting on proposals to improve the existing cycle route.
Our Response :
This is a useful N-S link suitable for all cyclists that has recently been considerably improved by the removal of through traffic from the Church Street area.
Regarding the current proposals for improvement :
1) Ivy Bridge to South Street :
Whilst the current speed humps could certainly be improved it seems a pity that the route continues to rely on them. A permeable road closure between Dawes Avenue and Napier Road would remove through motor traffic whilst allowing vehicular access to all properties.
2) South Street
This is currently the busiest section and we can see the need for changes. Nevertheless shared use of even a widened footway beside a carriageway is sub-optimal and risks conflict. A discrete cycle track would be a better solution.
3) Syon Park
Some sensible adjustments.
It is strongly to be hoped that the 4 gate chicane that has recently appeared will be removed ( it does not seem to be marked on the plans) The chicane is highly discriminatory towards less able cyclists using wider vehicles and is totally unacceptable.
Overall we are happy with the ambition to improve a valuable route but feel that some approaches are less than ideal.
FIRST SET OF BIKEHANGARS
ROYAL PARKS MOVEMENT STRATEGY
LOCAL PLAN “DIRECTION OF TRAVEL”
A316 LONDON ROAD ROUNDABOUT
All the consultations are here.
ACTIVE TRAVEL STRATEGY consultation – CLOSED
East Sheen Low Traffic Neighbourhood closes 27 September, 2019 – CLOSED
TFL and changes to the local bus network following closure of Hammersmith Bridge to motor traffic (deadline: 1 October 2019) – CLOSED
Royal Parks Movement Strategy (deadline: 14 July 2019) – CLOSED
Richmond Council and Hammersmith Bridge (deadline: 16 July 2019) – CLOSED
Richmond Council and Burtons Road area: proposed traffic-reducing measures (deadline: 26 July 2019) – CLOSED
We attended the Active Travel Advisory Group on 6 June 2019 , and there are lots of important updates …
One of our key borough routes is going to get a proper bi-directional cycle lane, providing protected cycling along its length. This is a huge change, and it’s such an important route the council sounds like it has secured TfL funding.
You know that row of parking on the Kew Road, over the cycle lane? Well the parking is going to give up to a cycle lane – the council told us on Thursday that Kew Road will get a cycle lane on both sides. Designs are still in progress, and it looks like the initial implementation won’t go all the way to Kew Bridge, but we think this is an important start.
Sometime in the next month, we’re going to see a consultation for thirty bikehangars. We know not all will be approved, but this means by Christmas the borough could have a dozen cycle hangars installed.
Two areas – Burtons Road and the East Sheen / Palmerston Road area are under consideration for low traffic neighbourhoods. Burtons Road is currently in consultation, and there was a meeting with councillors and officials for East Sheen on 10 June.
We think other areas could benefit from these – see the London Cycling / Living Streets briefing here: https://lcc.org.uk/articles/low-traffic-neighbourhoods-briefing-documents-launch
Four schools – St Stephens, Barnes, Stanley and Orleans Park – are on course to get ‘School Streets’. What’s that? More here – http://schoolstreets.org.uk/ – but basically it’s about setting our schools and their roads up to really make it the obvious choice to walk and cycle there, and to make driving the option you only take if you really, really need to.
Our next ‘Liveable Neighbourhoods’ bid is likely to be for Barnes and for Ham (possibility of two bids, rather than one). We’ll be thinking about it over the summer, but it’s worth everyone asking “What would be transformational in my neighbourhood?”
Burtons Road has long been an important route for cyclists enabling them to avoid the busy Park Road. Unfortunately has a long history of rat-running which has been aggravated by the use of sat-navs. Due to the narrowness of parts of the road that can make cycling effectively impossible at peak times. Road humps have been deployed to reduce speeds and there have been previous failed attempts to filter out through traffic.
The current proposals for two road closures and a one-way section should be enough to frustrate determined rat-runners whilst allowing vehicular access. That will return Burtons Road to being a pleasant place to walk and cycle at all times and should encourage a shift to active travel in accord with the mayor’s policies. This will be all the more important in the light of the decision to move Turing House School to Heathfield. It does seem to have local support and
RCC is thoroughly in favour.
Could we also note that the shared use section enabling cycle use of the informal crossing of Uxbridge Road at the end of Burtons road is marked by corrugated paving alone ;signage was never installed. Perhaps some signs might be erected as part of the proposed works.
Perhaps I should include the map showing (potential) connections.
Royal Parks Movement Strategy (deadline: 14 July 2019)
Richmond Council and Hammersmith Bridge (deadline: 16 July 2019)
Richmond Council and Burtons Road area: proposed traffic-reducing measures (deadline: 26 July 2019)
TFL and changes to the local bus network following closure of Hammersmith Bridge to motor traffic (deadline: 1 October 2019)
All the consultations are here.
One of our members has provided his experiences after acquiring a cycle camera and reporting traffic incidents to the Met Police’s Traffic Prosecution Services (TPS, aka Traffic Offence Report Team) over the course of a year.
Of 160 reports submitted in the year since April 2018, 59 resulted in Notices of Intended Prosecution (NIPs) being sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle concerned. Of these, four registered keepers failed to comply with their legal obligation to provide details of the driver of the vehicle at the time of the incident and are consequently facing legal proceedings for this offence. One such has already resulted in a £660 fine, £166 costs and six points on the owner’s licence.
Of the other 55 NIPs, no notice of what resulted has been received. A further 14 registered keepers received a letter informing them that an allegation had been made but that no action would be taken.
The bulk of the NIPs were for unsafe overtaking, usually too close to the cyclist, sometimes also too close to oncoming traffic, a few for overtaking on a bend including one that narrowly avoided a collision with oncoming traffic.
Eight were for overtaking on, or on the approach to, a pedestrian crossing, including when pedestrians have been crossing or about to cross.
Three were for driving on the footway, three more for failing to stop at a zebra crossing when our member was walking his bike across.
One (among several reported) was for failing to give way at a junction, one for driving in and then stopping in a contraflow cycle lane, one for turning right without observing the lane markings (ie cutting the corner and narrowly avoiding colliding with our member), and one for an illegal right turn.
Two reports received no response at all.
The most reports submitted by our member in a day was four, this on three occasions. In one such, all four incidents took place within twenty minutes on relatively quiet roads; three resulted in NIPs, the other in a letter.
Our member calculates that a NIP has been issued for roughly every five hours of his cycling and an incident worthy of report has occurred every two hours.
Certainly the TPS have a difficult job. They have to decide whether a prosecution is likely to be successful, not simply whether the driving might be considered poor, careless or dangerous, and they do not have much time to do so. Judging by the incident case numbers, reports are received every few minutes.
However, his impression is that they do not always read the reports closely and sometimes assume cyclists are reporting close passing when they are actually reporting something else. Very similar incidents often receive very different responses.
Nonethless, any camera-equipped cyclist is urged to make reports whenever appropriate in the hope that greater numbers of drivers may be encouraged to think carefully about their driving, their responsibilities, and the possible effects of their actions when on the road.